Annual Report 2025

Port State Control; Progress and performance, highlights of the Paris MoU 2025

The Paris MoU published its 2025 Annual Report on 1 July 2026. This report provides an overview of the activities and statistics of the Paris MoU in 2025, including performance lists.

During 2025, the number of refusals-of-access (bans) increased to 19, marking a rise following several years of relatively low figures.

The detention rate also trended upward, reaching 4.18% in 2025, compared to 4.03% in 2024. This follows a period of consistently elevated detention percentages in recent years, including the 4.25% recorded in 2022. The Paris MoU will continue to closely monitor these developments.

An analysis of deficiencies and detainable deficiencies reveals no significant shift towards non-compliance within any single convention or regulatory area. Instead, the data underscores recurring areas of concern that consistently show higher rates of non-compliance in both absolute and relative terms. These include fire safety (SOLAS Chapter II-2: 16.8%), structural and electrical elements (SOLAS Chapter II-1: 11.6%), and health protection, medical care, welfare and social security protection (MLC Title IV: 10.0%).

At the specific deficiency level, fire doors (3.1%) and Seafarers’ Employment Agreements (1.3%) remain prominent areas of non-compliance. Additionally, broader ISM-related deficiencies accounted for 4.5% of the total.

We are pleased to present the Paris MoU Annual Report for 2025, continuing our commitment to transparency and the enhancement of maritime safety. This year, we have further refined our digital approach, ensuring even greater accessibility for the public and the shipping industry. Our aim remains to provide clear and accessible information to all stakeholders.

For the past two years, we have expressed our concerns regarding the persistently high average detention rates. In 2022, we recorded a rate of 4.25%, with a slight improvement to 3.81% in 2023. However, in 2024, we observed a regrettable increase to 4.03%. These figures remain significantly higher than the pre-COVID-19 period, a trend that has persisted for the last three years. This necessitates continued close monitoring of developments in the coming period. Notably, an analysis of recorded deficiencies has not revealed any specific area as the primary cause of this increase in non-compliance. We urge all stakeholders to re-evaluate their operational practices and ensure adherence to international maritime standards.

A particularly alarming trend is the growing number of “false flag” ships worldwide. These ships are reported to be flying the flags of IMO member States and other States without the knowledge or authorisation of those States, and without possessing genuine certificates of registration. This evasion of legitimate flag State jurisdiction and control poses a significant threat to the safety of navigation, the well-being of seafarers, and the prevention of marine pollution. Such ships undermine the integrity of international maritime regulations, and we are working with the IMO and its member States to address this serious issue.

Compounding this concern is the increasing number of ships operating within the so-called “shadow” or “dark fleet”. By sailing through the coastal waters of Paris MoU member States without port calls, these ships effectively circumvent the Paris MoU’s risk-based port State control system. Because compliance with international maritime regulations cannot be monitored on these ships, risks to maritime safety and pollution prevention arise, impacting both the Paris MoU region and the global maritime community. Given the inherent limitations of Port State Control in effectively addressing the risks posed by ‘false flags’ and ‘shadow fleets’ which do not call to any ports in the Paris MoU region, innovative strategies and intensified international cooperation are now indispensable.

Our collaborative efforts with other regional Port State Control regimes have been further strengthened through ongoing information sharing and coordinated inspection campaigns. The invaluable contributions of the International Maritime Organization and International Labour Organization have been crucial in promoting global harmonisation.

The Paris MoU remains steadfast in its commitment to fostering safer, cleaner, and more efficient shipping. We extend our sincere gratitude to the European Commission, EMSA, and all our partner organisations for their unwavering support. Above all, we acknowledge the dedication of our Port State Control Officers and maritime administration colleagues, whose tireless efforts are the foundation of our success.

We look forward to a future of enhanced maritime safety, seafarer welfare and environmental protection, while acknowledging the significant challenges that lie ahead.

EMSA

EMSA supports and advises the Paris MoU in various ways. For example, EMSA manages the information system in which the inspection results are recorded and ensures updates and upgrades to the system. The inspection data recorded in the system is not only relevant as input for the risk-based inspection methodology itself, but is also shared with the IMO in order to draw conclusions about compliance with IMO requirements. In addition, this information is also interesting and relevant for the Paris MoU member Authorities themselves, for the shipping industry and for the general public.

Secondly, EMSA participates in the work of the Paris MoU by attending meetings and participating in task forces to advise the members of possible developments in the European Union with regard to port State control.

In addition, in a joint effort with the Paris MoU, EMSA also offers training for new entrant PSCOs and for experienced PSCOs (refresher trainings). This training programme has been revised during the year and will be delivered in a new format as of 2025 with different modules on specific topics delivered online and face-to-face.

Flag Performance – White List

Rank Flag Inspection 2023-2025 Detention 2023-2025 Black to Grey Limit Grey to White Limit Excess Factor
1 Cayman Islands, UK 299 0 29 13 -1.95
2 Sweden 312 1 30 14 -1.81
3 Norway 1742 23 140 104 -1.72
4 Denmark 1163 15 96 67 -1.68
5 Japan 244 1 24 10 -1.67
6 Singapore 1727 27 139 103 -1.62
7 France 292 2 28 13 -1.61
8 Finland 349 3 33 16 -1.59
9 Netherlands 2610 46 205 161 -1.59
10 Luxembourg 217 1 22 9 -1.58
11 Italy 817 14 70 45 -1.45
12 Hong Kong (China) 1416 28 115 83 -1.44
13 Germany 457 8 41 23 -1.28
14 Portugal 2268 58 179 138 -1.28
15 Bahamas 1604 40 130 95 -1.26
16 Malta 3637 101 280 229 -1.25
17 Isle of Man, UK 362 6 34 17 -1.24
18 Bermuda, UK 141 1 15 4 -1.13
19 China 294 5 28 13 -1.12
20 United States 139 1 15 4 -1.11
21 Marshall Islands 5166 167 392 331 -1.11
22 Cyprus 2155 65 171 131 -1.10
23 Spain 88 0 11 2 -1.00
24 United Kingdom 696 19 60 37 -0.99
25 Greece 544 15 48 28 -0.91
26 Saudi Arabia 77 0 10 1 -0.83
27 Ireland 72 0 9 1 -0.73
28 Gibraltar, UK 250 6 25 10 -0.73
29 Liberia 6319 276 476 408 -0.73
30 Croatia 97 1 11 2 -0.59
31 Barbados 957 39 80 54 -0.56
32 Turkey 611 23 54 32 -0.56
33 Estonia 87 1 11 2 -0.40
34 Jersey, UK 54 0 7 0 -0.22
35 Antigua and Barbuda 1757 95 141 105 -0.20
36 Panama 5731 338 433 369 -0.19
37 Faroe Islands 225 8 23 9 -0.18
38 Belgium 164 5 17 6 -0.16
39 Poland 43 0 6 0 0.04
40 Canada 35 0 5 0 0.09

Flag Performance – Grey List

Rank Flag Inspection 2023-2025 Detention 2023-2025 Black to Grey Limit Grey to White Limit Excess Factor
41 Korea, Republic of 219 9 22 9 0.03
42 Lithuania 107 3 12 3 0.04
43 Latvia 174 8 18 6 0.15
44 India 45 1 6 0 0.18
45 Morocco 43 1 6 0 0.19
46 San Marino 75 3 9 1 0.23
47 Algeria 71 3 9 1 0.26
48 Sierra Leone 172 10 18 6 0.33
49 Thailand 44 2 6 0 0.34
50 Russian Federation 83 5 10 1 0.41
51 Lebanon 35 2 5 0 0.42
52 Philippines 92 6 11 2 0.45
53 Egypt 38 3 6 0 0.56
54 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 245 19 24 10 0.63
55 Cook Islands 68 6 9 1 0.66
56 Albania 48 5 7 0 0.74
57 Bangladesh 55 6 7 0 0.80
58 Tuvalu 32 4 5 0 0.81
59 Tunisia 31 5 5 0 1.00

Flag Performance – Black List

Rank Flag Inspection 2023-2025 Detention 2023-2025 Black to Grey Limit Risk Excess Factor
60 Saint Kitts and Nevis 372 42 35 Medium Risk 1.59
61 Palau 517 60 46 1.80
62 Togo 213 28 22 1.87
63 Guinea-Bissau 83 13 10 1.91
64 Belize 259 35 25 Medium to High 2.08
65 Vanuatu 339 48 32 2.40
66 Viet Nam 44 9 6 2.48
67 Comoros 254 59 25 Very High Risk 4.99
68 Tanzania, United Republic of 205 59 21 6.55
69 Cameroon 138 44 15 7.14

RO Performance

rank RO inspections detentions limit low-medium limit medium-high Excess Factor performance
1 American Bureau of Shipping 6270 5 144 107 -1.89 High
2 DNV AS 18350 26 399 335 -1.84
3 Korean Register 2233 3 56 33 -1.76
4 Lloyd's Register 11729 25 260 209 -1.74
5 Bureau Veritas 12261 31 271 219 -1.70
6 Registro Italiano Navale Services S.p.A. 6878 25 157 118 -1.54
7 Nippon Kaiji Kyokai 8908 42 200 156 -1.42
8 China Classification Society 1360 4 36 18 -1.41
9 Polski Rejestr Statkow (Polish Register of Shipping) 559 3 17 5 -0.56
10 Russian Maritime Register of Shipping 146 0 6 0 0.06
11 Intermaritime Certification Services 78 0 4 0 0.19
12 Dromon Bureau of Shipping 640 7 19 6 0.04 Medium
13 Phoenix Register of Shipping 700 8 21 7 0.04
14 Croatian Register of Shipping 220 1 8 0 0.07
15 Turkish Lloyd 325 3 11 2 0.12
16 Qualitas Register of Shipping S.A. 134 1 6 0 0.23
17 Indian Register of Shipping 259 4 9 1 0.36
18 Macosnar Corporation 60 1 3 0 0.46
19 International Register of Shipping 371 7 12 2 0.46
20 Shipping Register of Ukraine 94 2 5 0 0.52
21 Overseas Marine Certification Services 285 6 10 1 0.53
22 Panama Maritime Documentation Services 160 4 7 0 0.62
23 Alfa Register of Shipping 69 2 4 0 0.63
24 National Shipping Adjuster Inc. 61 2 4 0 0.67
25 Capital Register of Shipping 93 3 5 0 0.71
26 Veritas Register of Shipping Ltd 88 3 4 0 0.73
27 International Naval Surveys Bureau 539 14 17 5 0.78
28 United Registration and Classification of Services 379 11 13 3 0.84
29 Isthmus Bureau of Shipping, S.A. 214 7 8 0 0.85
30 Bulgarian Register of Shipping 273 11 10 1 1.35 Low
31 Hellas Naval Bureau of Shipping S.M.P.C 106 6 5 0 1.64
32 Other 342 35 12 2 6.72